Knights and samurai had many differences and similarities they both came from different countries and they both had different lifesyles if a samurai's dad was a samurai he aslo had to become a samurai, but if a knight's father was a knight it was optional for him to become a knight. The knights were constantly under the threat of invasion() samurai, because of their isolation from any countries, settled local fights it was common for the daimyos to seize land and gain more power(. Knights were located in europe and samurai were in japan they both rode horses in battle and they fought with true spirit for the honor and dignity of their country armor between knights and samurai was very different.
Knights were slower due to heavier armor and heavier swords, but one good hit would devastate, where as samurai were quicker due to their lighter armor and swords, they also had faster sword play. The warriors of europe were called knights and the warriors of japan were called samurai the minamoto, one of japan’s largest military clans in the 1100s, won the civil war and set up a new government headed by a powerful general called the shogun. Samurai however were hurt by their forced isolation from the rest of the world and knights armor and weapons advanced further, with knights having plate armor that was far more protective and weighed the same as samurai armor, and better anti-armor weapons like the pole-ax and mace contrary to popular belief, samurai used the spear and bow. Best answer: knights and samurai are both supposed heavy calvary units in their armies as well as their main line meaning they were heavy armored horseback fighters(though knights consisted of spears and swords while samurai were spear and bows.
Samurai vs knight samurai and knights were different but the similarities were greater because of their rankings, training, armor, fighting technique, code of honor, and death viewpoint the japanese called their warriors samurai , and the europeans called their warriors knights. What was the difference between knights and samurais each was an expression of the culture in which they evolved, and reflect the cultural differences between europe and japan ‘samurai’ as an institution lasted roughly 1200 years and there were many changes during that time. Samurai and knights were both bound by a code that stressed honour, loyalty and protecting the weak but differences in the belief systems that influenced them meant differences in what constituted honour. Knights beat other knights using very specific sword techniques that the katana simply isn't designed to perform because samurai were not trained to deal with a knight's armor.
My friend switched from samurai to knight when knights had 9 territories bc all of our other friends were knights i told him, dude you're an idiot samurai are so gonna win but i was wrong and he still doesn't get a reward. Samurai have an armor made out of bamboo, leather and some metal but knights armor are made of steel or many chain mails joined together samurai didnt have the chivalry that was requested from. Samurai and knights were different but the similarities were greater because of their rankings, training, armor, fighting technique, code of honor, and death viewpoint the japanese called their warriors samurai, and the europeans called their warriors knights.
The three characteristics knights and samurai shared were having to follow strict codes of honor, had to be loyal and brave but at the same time they had to be humble and modest, and they were both greatly admired. Religion both knights and samurai were expected to be deeply however, the two groups of warriors practiced different religions knights were christians christianity is based on the life and teachings of jesus christ as you read in chapter 8, samurai political structure help to bring about feudalism in europe and japan (framework) 7. The samurai and the knight had his origins in military and economic need his role was as a warrior, and like the samurai in some cases he was little more than a thug rewarded for his viciousness but if a knight was to succeed, he had to take his role in the military seriously.
Training regime were different even among knights and samurai this is why you have german and italian swordmanship for example you might also consider that the ebglish knights fought on foot, while the french ones were almost always deployed as cavalry unit. Whag samurai and knights mini-dbq document questions name: use the following background essay and your samurai and knights mini-dbq document pack to answer the questions that follow you live in a country with a weak government and an even weaker army.
Knights were usually christian, while samurai followed buddhism, daoism, and confucianism one group of warriors were european, while the other was japanese both wore different types of protective gear. Ironically, the samurai's and the knights came from noble families, since horses, armor, and weapons were costly and their use required long training they stood at the top of the social hierarchy and had many privileges. Comparison between knights and samurai rank knights knights are the same, but their rule is different knight follow the chivalry practice tactics there were many tactics in battle cheating, ambushing and straight-on attacking life armour weapons significant people bibliography.